Re-engravingBy Ashley Baynton-Williams
|The cost of producing a copperplate map, or even an atlas, represented
a considerable investment for any publisher (a later article will discuss
some of the evidence for the time and cost involved). In order to
maximise the potential income for their expenditure, individual publishers
- from leading names like Abraham Ortelius and Johannes Blaeu downwards
- did everything in their power to extend the printing life of a particular
plate, often long beyond the point where the geographical information contained
had been up-dated.
In order to illustrate some of the techniques involved, physical evidence from the maps themselves, and to give an insight into publishers' practices, the printing history of two rival maps, depicting the English county of Cornwall, serves as a useful case-in-point.
|The first was published by Christopher Saxton in 1579, as part of his untitled county atlas of England and Wales, the first printed county atlas of England and Wales. The plates for Saxton's atlas remained in circulation, and use, until about 1775, passing through the hands of a variety of publishers, before ending up in the possession of Cluer Dicey. A printing life of almost two hundred years represents remarkable - but not unparalleled - longevity.|
|The second was prepared by John Speed, and first published in Speed's
The Theatre of the Empire of Great Britaine, in 1612, which was the first
printed atlas of the British Isles. With the publication of Speed's
atlas, Saxton's atlas was supplanted as the standard delineation of the
counties. Indeed, Speed's atlas was to be the most popular of all
county atlases until the 1750's, with miniature editions being produced
to satisfy a demand from those unwilling or unable to purchase the full-size
One feature of Speed's maps, as appearing in formal editions of the atlas, was two-pages of letterpress text printed on the reverse. One page contains a potted history of the county, supplemented with a general introduction to the county, its air, soil, commerce and so on. The second page is an alphabetical gazetteer of the principal cities, towns and villages of the county, giving the division of the county the place was to be found. This was an important improvement on Saxton, whose maps were issued without any accompanying text.
Here also, Speed's plates had a long life-span. They, too, came into the possession of Cluer Dicey, who reprinted them in the 1750s and 1760s. Dicey was a printer and publisher of chap-books, cheap printed items which were circulated through a network of chapmen - hawkers and pedlars who would travel around England, attending markets, fairs and so on, offering the books, ballads, portraits and topographical prints. The two series of county maps, which were principally sold as separate sheets, seem to have filled an important, and profitable, gap in the range of items Dicey offered, which may explain why he bought the Saxton plates, while also owning the parallel series of plates from Speed's atlas.
Evidently, the owner of the Saxton plates agreed, as the plates seem to have disappeared for a period from about 1595, or thereabouts, to the first years of the 1640s, when they emerge in the possession of the London printseller, William Webb, who published an edition of the maps in 1645. Webb made no real attempt to update the plates, beyond changing existing dates to 1642 and, in the majority of the maps, altering the Royal Arms, or accompanying initials to 'C[arolus].' 'R[ex].' Here Webb's principal intention was to tap into the market for maps of the parts of England arising from the English Civil War, and presumably felt that would-be purchasers would accept the maps without him having to materially revise or update them.
|In a similar fashion, the owner of the Speed plates, now William Humble,
son of one of the original publishers, re-issued the Speed atlas, in 1646.
At other times, he issued bound collections of the maps, but without text.
The example illustrated, extracted with from one such collection, is accompanied
by a manuscript gazetteer, apparently laboriously copied from a printed
Sales of both sets of maps seem not to have been very successful, judging by the very few sets to have survived. One important feature entirely lacking from both series, that could have made a important difference, was information on the contemporary road systems.
By about 1665, and possibly only shortly before that year, the plates for Saxton's maps came into the hands of an anonymous publisher. Unfortunately, there is no evidence for whom this might have been, while there are equally few potential candidates among the mapsellers of the period. While there is an outside possibility that Peter Stent is a candidate, I personally favour the possibility that it was a bookseller who had come into possession of the plates, but this can be no more than utterly speculative.
This publisher was prepared to undertake a new edition of the atlas, but felt that the plates, as acquired, required improvement and updating. So, and inevitably, the publisher looked to Speed's maps as a source and, insofar as possible, remodelled the Saxton plates in the image of the Speeds. For the map of Cornwall, obvious additions are the inset view of Launceston, the arms of previous Dukes of Cornwall, and the vignettes of the various antiquities and monuments.
However, it seems clear that the plates were never completed, and no edition of the atlas in this form is known. However, there is enough evidence, described by Harold Whitaker (1), and then taken on by Skelton (2), to make virtually certain that the plates were revised at this date. One can reasonably assume that the project was curtailed either by the Black Death, which ravaged London in1665, or the Great Fire of London (or a combination of the two).
By coincidence, the owners of the Speed plates, Roger Rea the Elder and Younger, were planning an edition of the Theatre at the same time. The partners, father and son, were content merely to insert their imprint on the plates. The printing was completed in 1665, but then the majority of the print run was destroyed in the Fire of London. At about the same time, one of the two partners also disappears, and these two events seem to have prevented any further editions.
|Saxton's plates were acquired by Philip Lea, circa 1685, or perhaps
later. Lea was newly established in business, so the acquisition
of the constituent plates for a county atlas must have been of great appeal.
Lea's first edition is believed to have been published in 1689.
His principal contribution to this edition was to complete the changes
begun by the anonymous editor, although not all the changes are found uniformly
across the set, further evidence of two publishers rather than one re-editing
the maps. Lea also inserted his name, crosses to denote market towns,
crowns to denote parliamentary boroughs and mires for bishoprics.
The extent to which the additional place names are the work of the anonymous
editor or Lea must remain uncertain, but the balance of probability is
that the majority of these changes date from 1665.
In this form, the individual maps, and the Cornwall is no exception, look crudely executed. Almost immediately Lea began to rework the plates, adding additional information, but a more important revision was to re-engrave many of the existing map-titles, not only to improve the appearance of individual maps, but also to achieve more uniformity within the series.
At this juncture, between about 1689 and 1694, when the revised edition was completed, Lea also made a more important addition, inserting roads, copied from John Ogilby's Britannia, first published in 1675. Lea's maps were the first set of folio county maps to include this information (the first series to do so was a pack of miniature playing cards), and this represents an important improvement.
At about the same time, Christopher Browne, the new owner of the Speed plates, seems to have planned to re-issue the plates. However, possibly in face of the success of Lea's second edition (which, with the exception of the original Saxton edition, is the most frequently encountered), Browne did little more than add his imprint to six of the plates, including the Cornwall, before abandoning the project. Two, or perhaps, three examples of Browne's "edition" only are known.
Following Philip Lea's edition of circa 1694, no subsequent owner of the Saxton plates made any material attempt to revitalise the geography, merely contenting themselves with alterations to the imprint. The principal explanations are that the plates came into the hands of publishers content to leave the plates unchanged, and the lack of any new source which could be easily used for revisions. Another possibility is that Saxton's maps, with the roads, had re-captured the initiative from the Speed plates.
In response, 1720, Henry Overton (I), while adding his imprint to the Speed plates, took the opportunity to insert roads, again copied from Ogilby, to bring the two sets back on par, and this was to prove the last important revision of Speed's plates.
While the two series continued to be sold for the next forty or fifty years, the emergence of pocket-sized or quarto-atlases, from 1720 onwards, and then from 1749 onwards, sheets from The Large English Atlas represented new competition, more in tune with the needs of the time. Jefferys's catalogue of circa 1765 refers to 'Saxton's Counties, being the Oldest Maps of England extant, from which the Quarter-Master's Map was compiled by order of Oliver Crowell. price 1l. 1s. in boards' (quoted by Donald Holdson, p. 148).Then, completion of The Large English Atlas reduced the role of both sets to antiquarian curiosities only.
|In the course of re-modelling and updating the two series, the publishers
concerned also faced numbers of problems, part and parcel of working with
The principal problem was that copper is a soft metal, ideal for the engraver, when he was working up the image, but a problem for the printer because, with the stresses on the plate during the printing process, the plate could quickly become worn, so that the engraved lines which would hold the ink became shallower and shallower, and the printed image would become successively paler.
While no-one really knows how many impressions, or individual prints, could be taken from a copperplate before it deteriorated, estimates seem to range from about 1,000 to 3,000 prints. At this point the publisher could have the plate re-worked, with an engraver going back over the plates, to recut the lines, making them deeper again.
Frequently, this work would be confined to geographical detail, so these lines might appear strong, while the lines of the decorative elements, title cartouche, vignettes, and so on would appear much paler by comparison.
Similarly, when inserting new geographical detail, the new lettering and symbols often stand out from the neighbouring detail by the strength of the impression, differences in the style of the lettering and, often, by the fact that the new lettering had to be cramped to fit the available space.
Another problem associated with the softness of metal was that the plates were easily scratched, particularly while being moved between the press and store cupboard, or while in storage. For example, in the original Saxton plates, between 1576 and 1590, a series of light parallel scratches appear behind the cartouche containing the reference to Queen Elizabeth, but then they disappear again.
In more extreme cases, the copperplate itself would crack. While it was often possible to disguise such a crack, particularly if only a short print run was involved, in many cases, as a last resort, the publisher was compelled to replace the plate. Saxton's map of Cornwall exhibits a crack in the plate throughout its printing life. Unusually, while the crack seems to have thickened out, it did not materially increase in length, which is most unusual.
In the course of printing, cracks act like any engraved line. They take in the ink, which remains trapped until the paper and plate are forced together. In most cases, cracks start from the edge of the printing plate, into the border, and are readily identifiable by their jagged and irregular shape, and frequently follow lines of weakness in the plate, such as engraved lines of latitude and longitude, or some such. More rarely they can be found within the plate area, apparently originating from careless reworking, where the engraver has actually worked right through the plate.
(1) Harold Whitaker The Later Editions of Saxton's Maps, in Imago Mundi III (Reprint Edition: Amsterdam: Nico Israel, 1967), p.72-86, especially p.74-77).
(2) R.A. Skelton County Atlases Of The British Isles 1579-1850 A Bibliography 1579-1703 (Reprint edition, London: Dawsons, 1978), no.80.